I'm not sure but I believe they stopped chrome lining the barrels at some point. It should give you the twist rate and should be stamped 5.56 mm nato or something like that. Look on your barrel in front of the front site base. It shoots very well and I've never had a problem with it. I kept it exactly the same, minus a JARD 4lb non adjustable trigger (I kept the factory trigger in a bag). I bought it because it was just like the one I got issued in basic training. During the dark times of the awb I got the letter from Armalite saying it was sold as a complete rifle in a pre-ban configuration (chrome lined 1:7 barrel, bayonet lug, pistol grip, etc) in case I wanted to put a collapsable stock on it. The barrel on mine is a 1:7 chrome lined. It was an EA-15 A2 rifle, complete, with the white stamp on the front of the mag well. I purchased it shortly after the assault weapon ban. The parts I've used in recent years from RRA and Stag/CMT are superior to those early EA parts, and the fit is also better on several currently made receivers over the EA's (Ameetec, Stag/CMT, RRA, etc.) The Eagle-15 ORC remains true to delivering a valued based product with the same quality and commitment that is put into all Armalite rifles.
![eagle arms ea 15 bi pod adapter eagle arms ea 15 bi pod adapter](https://palmettostatearmory.com/media/catalog/product/cache/7af8331bf1196ca28793bd1e8f6ecc7b/7/0/705-Champion-AR-15-Bipod-Adaptor-40450.jpg)
This will allow shooters to add on a wide variety of aftermarket sights. Still, the EA based weapons have served me well for the last 13-14 years. Eagle Arms EA-15 5.56 NATO/223 Rem Rifle The Eagle-15 Optics Ready Carbine (ORC) 15EA02 offers users a new level in versatility with its rail gas block. Most of the parts I ended up using were Bushmaster, including the barrels, which were of better quality at the time (Bushmaster got a lot better after they secured their first Gov't. The Eagle Arms lower receiver parts kits were not real consistent in their quality. pivot pins, I resorted to lapping the holes with a steel rod an lapping compound until the hole alignment was correct. The pivot pin alignment holes were slightly off and after trying numerous manuf. I remember a little difficulty with the fit between the upper and lower on the H-Bar, but not the M4gery.
#Eagle arms ea 15 bi pod adapter full#
One is an early M4gery with full carry handle A-2 upper, and the other is an H-BAR. I have two weapons that I built on pre-Armalite Eagle Arms upper and lower receivers.
![eagle arms ea 15 bi pod adapter eagle arms ea 15 bi pod adapter](https://33.cdn.ekm.net/ekmps/shops/3f5dcc/images/lpe-airsoft-14mm-ccw-medium-thread-adapter-xcortech-xt301-38041-p.jpg)
If you bought seperate components, the build quality could be very inconsistent. If assembled at the factory as a complete weapon, they functioned fairly well. The front sight bases were also cast, and not forged.if I remember correctly. The barrels were non-chrome lined, 1-9" twist.